In other languages: Deutsch Français 日本語 Nederlands Polski Русский Українська 简体中文

Nuclear reactor: Difference between revisions

From Official Factorio Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (whitespace)
(23 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Languages}}
{{Languages}}
{{:Infobox:Nuclear reactor}}
{{:Infobox:Nuclear reactor}}
 
The '''nuclear reactor''' generates heat by burning [[uranium fuel cell]]s. The heat can be used in a [[heat exchanger]] to produce steam which can be used to generate power. Unlike other forms of power generation, it is load-independent each fuel cell will always be used completely in 200 seconds, regardless of load or the temperature of the reactor. To prevent wasting fuel, excess power can be stored in [[accumulator]]s, excess steam can be stored in [[storage tank]]s.
The '''nuclear reactor''' generates heat by burning [[uranium fuel cell]]s. The heat can be used in a [[heat exchanger]] to produce steam which can be used to generate power. Unlike other forms of power generation, it is load-independent - each fuel cell will always be used completely in 200 seconds, regardless of load or the temperature of the reactor.


Instead of completely consuming the fuel, burning fuel in a nuclear reactor results in [[used up uranium fuel cell]]s. These used up cells can be [[nuclear fuel reprocessing|reprocessed]] in a [[centrifuge]] to get back some of the uranium used to create the fuel cells.
Instead of completely consuming the fuel, burning fuel in a nuclear reactor results in [[used up uranium fuel cell]]s. These used up cells can be [[nuclear fuel reprocessing|reprocessed]] in a [[centrifuge]] to get back some of the uranium used to create the fuel cells.


Nuclear reactors have a heat capacity of 10 MJ/C. Thus, they can buffer 5 GJ of heat energy across their working range of 500C to 1000C, and require 4.85 GJ of energy to warm up from 15C to 500C when initially placed.
Nuclear reactors have a heat capacity of 10 MJ/C. Thus, they can buffer 5 GJ of heat energy across their working range of 500°C to 1000°C, and require 4.85 GJ of energy to warm up from 15°C to 500°C when initially placed.
 
== Adjacency bonus ==
Reactors receive a bonus for adjacent operating reactors, which increases their effective thermal output by 100% per each such link. For example, two reactors operating next to each other will output a total of 160 MW of thermal energy, with each reactor producing 40 MW base and receiving 40 MW of adjacency bonus.


The adjacency condition is that a reactor must connect to another reactor with all 3 heat pipe connections on a side (corners & middle of side, see graphic), and these connections must have zero length, to receive the bonus for that side. This means that:
== Neighbour bonus ==
* reactors must be on neighboring tiles; connecting reactors by the [[heat pipe]] entity gives no bonus
Reactors receive a bonus for adjacent operating reactors, which increases their effective thermal output by 100% per each such link. For example, two reactors operating next to each other will output a total of 160 MW of thermal energy, with each reactor producing 40 MW base and receiving 40 MW of neighbour bonus.
* offset connections are possible; however, all 3 tiles on that side of the reactor in question must neighbor ''some'' other reactor


Additionally, un-fueled reactors do not confer any bonus.
The Neighbour bonus only applies if:
* 2 reactors are directly next to eachother with all 3 heat connections directly connecting the two.
* Both reactors are fueled.


=== Double-row layout ===
=== Double-row layout ===
The most efficient practical layout is an aligned double row of arbitrary length (number of reactors as needed). For even numbers of reactors, the total output of the array is <code> 160n - 160 MW</code> (where ''n'' = total number of reactors, and assuming all are fueled). Splitting the row, while possibly logistically beneficial, reduces total power output by 160 MW per split.
The most efficient practical layout is an aligned double row of arbitrary length (number of reactors as needed). For even numbers of reactors, the total output of the array is <code> 160n 160 MW</code> (where ''n'' = total number of reactors, and assuming all are fueled). Splitting the row, while possibly logistically beneficial, reduces total power output by 160 MW per split.


Odd numbers of reactors are inefficient in maximizing the bonus, but, if needed, the odd reactor should be aligned with one of the rows. Offsetting the longer row instead would not gain the extra reactor any bonus, while the reactor on the other end of the same row would lose its bonus as well. Placing the odd reactor between the ends of aligned rows would also lead to one fewer bonus, and also make the design un-tileable.
Odd numbers of reactors are inefficient in maximizing the bonus, but, if needed, the odd reactor should be aligned with one of the rows. Offsetting the longer row instead would not gain the extra reactor any bonus, while the reactor on the other end of the same row would lose its bonus as well. Placing the odd reactor between the ends of aligned rows would also lead to one fewer bonus, and also make the design un-tileable.


In any case however, such concerns are unlikely to arise until one has a very large base, as the individual output of reactors is massive, particularly with adjacency bonuses. As an example, a 5 x 2 reactor grid would produce 1,440 MW (1.44 GW), the equivalent of 1,600 steam engines, or 24,000 solar panels.
In any case however, such concerns are unlikely to arise until one has a very large base, as the individual output of reactors is massive, particularly with neighbour bonuses. As an example, a 5×2 reactor grid would produce 1,440 MW (1.44 GW), the equivalent of 1,600 steam engines, or 24,000 solar panels.


=== Square layout ===
=== Square layout ===
Theoretically, a perfectly square grid of reactors with no spaces between would provide maximum bonus, as it minimizes the number of reactors with unlinked sides. This setup produces <code>200n - 4(sqrt(n) - 2) - 320 MW</code> (where ''sqrt(n)'' is the square root of the number of reactors).
Theoretically, a perfectly square grid of reactors with no spaces between would provide maximum bonus, as it minimizes the number of reactors with unlinked sides. This setup produces <code>200n − 160×sqrt(n) MW</code> (where ''sqrt(n)'' is the square root of the number of reactors).


However, while the heat pipe links will allow energy flow from reactors within the square, with no room around inner reactors, there will be no way to insert and remove fuel cells except manually (heat pipes are traversable by the player), which makes this setup impractical.
However, while the heat pipe links will allow energy flow from reactors within the square, with no room around inner reactors, there will be no way to insert and remove fuel cells except manually (heat pipes are traversable by the player), which makes this setup impractical.


Furthermore, the gains compared to the double-row design are not large. After some calculation, one arrives at the expression for the ratio of the two (double-row design in denominator) as <code>(1.25n - sqrt(n)) / (n - 1)</code> which evaluates to, for example, 1 for 4 reactors, 1.07 for 16 reactors, 1.16 for 100 reactors (considering only numbers that both an equal-length double row and a square can be built from), and so on. In the limit (infinite number of reactors), the ratio approaches 1.25 as the edge corrections become insignificant.
Furthermore, the gains compared to the double-row design are not large. After some calculation, one arrives at the expression for the ratio of the two (double-row design in denominator) as <code>(1.25n sqrt(n)) ÷ (n 1)</code> which evaluates to, for example, 1 for 4 reactors, 1.07 for 16 reactors, 1.16 for 100 reactors (considering only numbers that both an equal-length double row and a square can be built from), and so on. In the limit (infinite number of reactors), the ratio approaches 1.25 as the edge corrections become insignificant.
 
== Explosion ==
If a reactor is destroyed (by damage) while it is above 900°C, it will explode just like an [[atomic bomb]]. This explosion has enough power to destroy other reactors, so one explosion can lead to a chain reaction of exploding reactors. [https://clips.twitch.tv/KathishShakingPieBIRB]


== History ==
== History ==
{{History|0.18.0|
* Updated sound effects.}}
{{History|0.17.67|
* Heat pipes (also in reactors and heat exchangers) glow with high temperatures.}}
{{History|0.16.0|
* Changed nuclear reactor stack size to 10.}}
{{History|0.15.0|
{{History|0.15.0|
* Introduced}}
* Introduced}}
Line 39: Line 49:
* [[Heat pipe]]
* [[Heat pipe]]
* [[Steam turbine]]
* [[Steam turbine]]
* [https://gist.github.com/alficles/972796997d1bc40d57866b0a3725895a Comprehensive guide on nuclear power]
* [[Tutorial:Nuclear power|Comprehensive guide on nuclear power]]


{{ProductionNav}}
{{ProductionNav}}
{{C|Energy}}
{{C|Energy}}

Revision as of 19:37, 12 April 2024

Nuclear reactor.png
Nuclear reactor

Nuclear reactor entity.png

Recipe

Time.png
8
+
Advanced circuit.png
500
+
Concrete.png
500
+
Copper plate.png
500
+
Steel plate.png
500
Nuclear reactor.png
1

Total raw

Time.png
4.8k
+
Concrete.png
500
+
Copper plate.png
3k
+
Iron plate.png
1k
+
Plastic bar.png
1k
+
Steel plate.png
500

Map color

Health

Quality normal.png 500
Quality uncommon.png 650 Quality rare.png 800
Quality epic.png 950 Quality legendary.png 1250

Stack size

10

Rocket capacity

1 (0.1 stacks)

Dimensions

5×5

Energy consumption

Quality normal.png 40
Quality uncommon.png 52 Quality rare.png 64
Quality epic.png 76 Quality legendary.png 100
MW (burner)

Heat output

Quality normal.png 40
Quality uncommon.png 52 Quality rare.png 64
Quality epic.png 76 Quality legendary.png 100
MW heat

Maximum temperature

1000 °C

Mining time

0.5

Prototype type

reactor

Internal name

nuclear-reactor

Required technologies

Nuclear power (research).png

Produced by

Assembling machine 1.png
Assembling machine 2.png
Assembling machine 3.png
Player.png

Valid fuel

Uranium fuel cell.png

The nuclear reactor generates heat by burning uranium fuel cells. The heat can be used in a heat exchanger to produce steam which can be used to generate power. Unlike other forms of power generation, it is load-independent – each fuel cell will always be used completely in 200 seconds, regardless of load or the temperature of the reactor. To prevent wasting fuel, excess power can be stored in accumulators, excess steam can be stored in storage tanks.

Instead of completely consuming the fuel, burning fuel in a nuclear reactor results in used up uranium fuel cells. These used up cells can be reprocessed in a centrifuge to get back some of the uranium used to create the fuel cells.

Nuclear reactors have a heat capacity of 10 MJ/C. Thus, they can buffer 5 GJ of heat energy across their working range of 500°C to 1000°C, and require 4.85 GJ of energy to warm up from 15°C to 500°C when initially placed.

Neighbour bonus

Reactors receive a bonus for adjacent operating reactors, which increases their effective thermal output by 100% per each such link. For example, two reactors operating next to each other will output a total of 160 MW of thermal energy, with each reactor producing 40 MW base and receiving 40 MW of neighbour bonus.

The Neighbour bonus only applies if:

  • 2 reactors are directly next to eachother with all 3 heat connections directly connecting the two.
  • Both reactors are fueled.

Double-row layout

The most efficient practical layout is an aligned double row of arbitrary length (number of reactors as needed). For even numbers of reactors, the total output of the array is 160n − 160 MW (where n = total number of reactors, and assuming all are fueled). Splitting the row, while possibly logistically beneficial, reduces total power output by 160 MW per split.

Odd numbers of reactors are inefficient in maximizing the bonus, but, if needed, the odd reactor should be aligned with one of the rows. Offsetting the longer row instead would not gain the extra reactor any bonus, while the reactor on the other end of the same row would lose its bonus as well. Placing the odd reactor between the ends of aligned rows would also lead to one fewer bonus, and also make the design un-tileable.

In any case however, such concerns are unlikely to arise until one has a very large base, as the individual output of reactors is massive, particularly with neighbour bonuses. As an example, a 5×2 reactor grid would produce 1,440 MW (1.44 GW), the equivalent of 1,600 steam engines, or 24,000 solar panels.

Square layout

Theoretically, a perfectly square grid of reactors with no spaces between would provide maximum bonus, as it minimizes the number of reactors with unlinked sides. This setup produces 200n − 160×sqrt(n) MW (where sqrt(n) is the square root of the number of reactors).

However, while the heat pipe links will allow energy flow from reactors within the square, with no room around inner reactors, there will be no way to insert and remove fuel cells except manually (heat pipes are traversable by the player), which makes this setup impractical.

Furthermore, the gains compared to the double-row design are not large. After some calculation, one arrives at the expression for the ratio of the two (double-row design in denominator) as (1.25n − sqrt(n)) ÷ (n − 1) which evaluates to, for example, 1 for 4 reactors, 1.07 for 16 reactors, 1.16 for 100 reactors (considering only numbers that both an equal-length double row and a square can be built from), and so on. In the limit (infinite number of reactors), the ratio approaches 1.25 as the edge corrections become insignificant.

Explosion

If a reactor is destroyed (by damage) while it is above 900°C, it will explode just like an atomic bomb. This explosion has enough power to destroy other reactors, so one explosion can lead to a chain reaction of exploding reactors. [1]

History

  • 0.18.0:
    • Updated sound effects.
  • 0.17.67:
    • Heat pipes (also in reactors and heat exchangers) glow with high temperatures.
  • 0.16.0:
    • Changed nuclear reactor stack size to 10.

See also