Is direct insertion an encyclopaedic matter?
I notice that after some previous discussion, the decision was made to add ratio information (eg 3:2). However, I also think that direct insertion can also be an important design element.
Is information on the efficiency of this production design encyclopaedic and non-trivial? I feel like it is important and relevant information worth writing, and if included in the page, it may be possible to comment on this without recommending a particular choice. Techhead7890 (talk) 11:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think that direction insertion is objective. If it was, we'd have to include it in a lot of pages, such as steel plates, transport belts and <whatever else one might direct insert> which shows that it is subjective where direct insertion could be used. -- Bilka (talk) - Admin 12:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)