User talk:Mskvaer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Biochambers cost nutrients: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
You've added this note to a couple of pages, but I'm not sure what the point of it is. The [[Biochamber]] page makes it clear that it runs on fuel, specifically nutrients. I don't think every Biochamber recipe page needs a note explicitly reminding people how the Biochamber works. Especially since this notation is... insufficient (as the actual amount of power consumed will depend on things like module usage). [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] ([[User talk:Alfonse|talk]]) 16:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | You've added this note to a couple of pages, but I'm not sure what the point of it is. The [[Biochamber]] page makes it clear that it runs on fuel, specifically nutrients. I don't think every Biochamber recipe page needs a note explicitly reminding people how the Biochamber works. Especially since this notation is... insufficient (as the actual amount of power consumed will depend on things like module usage). [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] ([[User talk:Alfonse|talk]]) 16:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, I see your point. My reasoning is that looking at the icons for production, one "forgets" that a Nutrient feed is needed, too. I was speculating whether to add it more ... I wont for the while while being. [[User:Mskvaer|Mskvaer]] ([[User talk:Mskvaer|talk]]) 14:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:(On a semirelated note for the Nutrients page: the note that assembler 1 cant be used is superflous, too, as the pictograms do not show a level 1) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:31, 21 December 2024
Yes ... ?
Biochambers cost nutrients
You've added this note to a couple of pages, but I'm not sure what the point of it is. The Biochamber page makes it clear that it runs on fuel, specifically nutrients. I don't think every Biochamber recipe page needs a note explicitly reminding people how the Biochamber works. Especially since this notation is... insufficient (as the actual amount of power consumed will depend on things like module usage). Alfonse (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I see your point. My reasoning is that looking at the icons for production, one "forgets" that a Nutrient feed is needed, too. I was speculating whether to add it more ... I wont for the while while being. Mskvaer (talk) 14:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- (On a semirelated note for the Nutrients page: the note that assembler 1 cant be used is superflous, too, as the pictograms do not show a level 1)