Archive talk:Curved rail: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (BilkaBot moved page Talk:Curved rail to Archive talk:Curved rail: Move archived pages to separate namespace) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page should be deleted. [[User:Mattj256|Mattj256]] ([[User talk:Mattj256|talk]]) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC) | This page should be deleted. [[User:Mattj256|Mattj256]] ([[User talk:Mattj256|talk]]) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
: No it shouldn't, it should either redirect to normal rails, or it should talk about the way it used to work before 0.13 with notes on it not working anymore today. [[User:TheWombatGuru|TheWombatGuru]] ([[User talk:TheWombatGuru|talk]]) 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | : No it shouldn't, it should either redirect to normal rails, or it should talk about the way it used to work before 0.13 with notes on it not working anymore today. [[User:TheWombatGuru|TheWombatGuru]] ([[User talk:TheWombatGuru|talk]]) 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:: Correct, it'd be better to leave it in existence, talking about pre-0.13 rails, so anyone looking up how the old rail system works won't get confused. Just put a disclaimer saying it was removed in 0.13, with links to [[rail planner]] and the new rails. --[[User:Gangsir|Gangsir]] ([[User talk:Gangsir|talk]]) 20:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 26 April 2024
This page should be deleted. Mattj256 (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- No it shouldn't, it should either redirect to normal rails, or it should talk about the way it used to work before 0.13 with notes on it not working anymore today. TheWombatGuru (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Correct, it'd be better to leave it in existence, talking about pre-0.13 rails, so anyone looking up how the old rail system works won't get confused. Just put a disclaimer saying it was removed in 0.13, with links to rail planner and the new rails. --Gangsir (talk) 20:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)