Talk:Trees: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page; added classification thoughts) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Classification == | == Classification == | ||
At the time of this writing, Trees are classified as machinery. I feel that this is not quite accurate, but changing it to a resource is not quite accurate either, as [[Raw wood] is the resource from trees. Are there any thoughts on what it should be classified as? Possibly create a new category (although it may not be worth it, as there isn't really anything else like it yet)? | At the time of this writing, Trees are classified as machinery. I feel that this is not quite accurate, but changing it to a resource is not quite accurate either, as [[Raw wood] is the resource from trees. Are there any thoughts on what it should be classified as? Possibly create a new category (although it may not be worth it, as there isn't really anything else like it yet)? | ||
: The devs call it "biomes", which I find quite matching. :) [[User:Ssilk|Ssilk]] ([[User talk:Ssilk|talk]]) 00:30, 9 June 2014 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:30, 8 June 2014
Classification
At the time of this writing, Trees are classified as machinery. I feel that this is not quite accurate, but changing it to a resource is not quite accurate either, as [[Raw wood] is the resource from trees. Are there any thoughts on what it should be classified as? Possibly create a new category (although it may not be worth it, as there isn't really anything else like it yet)?