Talk:Buffer chest: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Runamucker (talk | contribs) m (formatting) |
Runamucker (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
"''Requesters requesting from buffer chests (which includes players) have higher priority than other requesters.''" | "''Requesters requesting from buffer chests (which includes players) have higher priority than other requesters.''" | ||
This is not true. Requesters requesting from active provider chests have the highest priority. I'd fix it myself, but I don't know what it's supposed to say. My best guess is it's supposed to say that different pick-up priorities were added to the various types of chest, but it could also mean that there already were priorities, but they were reordered. Either way, this needs to be fixed by someone who has a better source. --[[User:Runamucker|Runamucker]] ([[User talk:Runamucker|talk]]) 04:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | This is not true. Requesters requesting from '''''active provider chests''''' have the highest priority. I'd fix it myself, but I don't know what it's supposed to say. My best guess is it's supposed to say that different pick-up priorities were added to the various types of chest, but it could also mean that there already were priorities, but they were reordered. Either way, this needs to be fixed by someone who has a better source. --[[User:Runamucker|Runamucker]] ([[User talk:Runamucker|talk]]) 04:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:23, 14 March 2022
The article currently states:
"Requesters requesting from buffer chests (which includes players) have higher priority than other requesters."
This is not true. Requesters requesting from active provider chests have the highest priority. I'd fix it myself, but I don't know what it's supposed to say. My best guess is it's supposed to say that different pick-up priorities were added to the various types of chest, but it could also mean that there already were priorities, but they were reordered. Either way, this needs to be fixed by someone who has a better source. --Runamucker (talk) 04:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)