Infobox talk:Artificial jellynut soil: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Questioning whether "total raw" is useful. |
Game shows total so wiki does too |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Is "total raw" even a useful concept? Does 2.0 still show this cost, or did they take that out? If the game still shows it, then maybe we should copy that. But if the game doesn't, then it's unclear why we need to keep it around. And if we do want to keep it around, I would presume that it should favor recipes the player can do. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] ([[User talk:Alfonse|talk]]) 18:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | : Is "total raw" even a useful concept? Does 2.0 still show this cost, or did they take that out? If the game still shows it, then maybe we should copy that. But if the game doesn't, then it's unclear why we need to keep it around. And if we do want to keep it around, I would presume that it should favor recipes the player can do. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] ([[User talk:Alfonse|talk]]) 18:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
:: 2.0 still shows the total raw in the tooltip in-game, so the wiki will continue to copy it. -- [[User:Bilka|Bilka]] ([[User talk:Bilka|talk]]) - <span style="color:#FF0000">Admin</span> 12:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:09, 1 April 2025
Nutrients in "total raw"
So you need 50 Nutrients in the recipe - but there are many alternative ways to get it, which affects the "total raw" line. Biter egss were used in the version before my edit, is not the most basic/obvious choice. What should be shown in "total raw" when it is ambiguous? Mskvaer (talk) 16:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Is "total raw" even a useful concept? Does 2.0 still show this cost, or did they take that out? If the game still shows it, then maybe we should copy that. But if the game doesn't, then it's unclear why we need to keep it around. And if we do want to keep it around, I would presume that it should favor recipes the player can do. Alfonse (talk) 18:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)