Talk:Solid fuel: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Correct me if I miscalculated. Otherwise, I will change the Page in few days. | Correct me if I miscalculated. Otherwise, I will change the Page in few days. | ||
[[User:Tamanous|Tamanous]] ([[User talk:Tamanous|talk]]) | |||
:That is not so much a miscalculation as a miscomparison. Here's an alternate breakdown: | |||
That is not so much a miscalculation as a miscomparison. Here's an alternate breakdown: | |||
{| | :{| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 Heavy Oil : 1 Solid Fuel | |2 Heavy Oil : 1 Solid Fuel | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
|} | |} | ||
You must use the ratio of '''Heavy Oil to one Solid Fuel''', which is either (2:1) or (1.3:1). | :You must use the ratio of '''Heavy Oil to one Solid Fuel''', which is either (2:1) or (1.3:1). | ||
The 1.3 is 1.3333333, obviously, one and a third. It rounds to 1.3. | :The 1.3 is 1.3333333, obviously, one and a third. It rounds to 1.3. | ||
To get (1.5:1) it looks like you are leaving the (1.3:1) expressed as (2:1.5), and then comparing the 1.5 Solid Fuel from one ratio to 1 Solid Fuel from the other ratio. But that doesn't make sense, you can't ratio Solid Fuel to Solid Fuel. | :To get (1.5:1) it looks like you are leaving the (1.3:1) expressed as (2:1.5), and then comparing the 1.5 Solid Fuel from one ratio to 1 Solid Fuel from the other ratio. But that doesn't make sense, you can't ratio Solid Fuel to Solid Fuel. | ||
::Thank you. Seemed I got lost at some point, as I've written " = 2 Heavy Oil : 1,5 Solid Fuel" ... [[User:Tamanous|Tamanous]] ([[User talk:Tamanous|talk]]) 17:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
== When to use solid fuel as fuel == | |||
Is this entire section needed? It starts with an explanation why one should not bother with changing the infrastructure from coal to solid fuel, but then it basically says "well, as of 0.15 you can, because oil liquefaction. carry on." I understand why it was needed when 0.15 was published, but now? | |||
The finishing sentence regarding megajules could be just merged into the first section on the page. | |||
--[[User:Fazzah|Fazzah]] ([[User talk:Fazzah|talk]]) 22:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Besides the issues you listed, that section was also an opinion, which we don't allow on the wiki. I have removed the section and added the finishing sentence to the first section like you suggested. -- [[User:Bilka|Bilka]] ([[User talk:Bilka|talk]]) - <span style="color:#FF0000">Admin</span> 07:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Great, thanks for prompt reply --[[User:Fazzah|Fazzah]] ([[User talk:Fazzah|talk]]) 11:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:14, 4 August 2018
Which Solid Fuel recipe to use
On 05:05, 19 June 2016, Hamburger changed the adjusted ratio (Heavy Oil to Solid Fuel) from 2:1,5 to 1,3:1.
"Heavy Oil has a much worse ratio (2:1) and should be cracked into Light Oil first instead. The cracking process changes the ratio for Heavy Oil to 1.3:1, which is much better."
I think the old ratio of 1,5 : 1 was correct. Let me recap this in short:
2 Heavy Oil : 1 Solid Fuel | |||
-> | 2 Heavy Oil : 1,5 Light Oil | ||
-> | 1,5 Light Oil : 1,5 Solid Fuel | ||
-> | = 2 Heavy Oil : 1,5 Solid Fuel |
Correct me if I miscalculated. Otherwise, I will change the Page in few days. Tamanous (talk)
- That is not so much a miscalculation as a miscomparison. Here's an alternate breakdown:
2 Heavy Oil : 1 Solid Fuel OR 2 Heavy Oil : 1.5 Light Oil -> 1.5 Light Oil : 1.5 Solid Fuel -> 2.0 Heavy Oil : 1.5 Solid Fuel = 4.0 Heavy Oil : 3.0 Solid Fuel = 1.3 Heavy Oil : 1.0 Solid Fuel
- You must use the ratio of Heavy Oil to one Solid Fuel, which is either (2:1) or (1.3:1).
- The 1.3 is 1.3333333, obviously, one and a third. It rounds to 1.3.
- To get (1.5:1) it looks like you are leaving the (1.3:1) expressed as (2:1.5), and then comparing the 1.5 Solid Fuel from one ratio to 1 Solid Fuel from the other ratio. But that doesn't make sense, you can't ratio Solid Fuel to Solid Fuel.
When to use solid fuel as fuel
Is this entire section needed? It starts with an explanation why one should not bother with changing the infrastructure from coal to solid fuel, but then it basically says "well, as of 0.15 you can, because oil liquefaction. carry on." I understand why it was needed when 0.15 was published, but now?
The finishing sentence regarding megajules could be just merged into the first section on the page.