Talk:Raw fish: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→breeding quality + being put back into the water: new section) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
unless this was changed in the latest experimental, but i don't see anything about this in the changelogs | unless this was changed in the latest experimental, but i don't see anything about this in the changelogs | ||
: If you know information is wrong, you don't have to ask permission to correct it. The fish breeding one is odd, because it's the only catalytic organic recipe that cannot use quality modules. Yes, ore bacteria and pentapod egg production can use quality modules (though because they're catalytic, the biochamber cannot reuse any outputs that are higher quality). But for some reason fish breeding is not. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] ([[User talk:Alfonse|talk]]) 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:46, 6 December 2024
Rename raw fish into fish? --Darkfrei (talk) 08:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, the item is named raw fish and items take priority for page names over the entity names. Another example of that are the combat robot capsules. -- Bilka (talk) - Admin 08:30, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
breeding quality + being put back into the water
the info is wrong? you can place them back into the water with Y(uses 5 fish)
and you can't use quality modules in the breeding recipe
unless this was changed in the latest experimental, but i don't see anything about this in the changelogs
- If you know information is wrong, you don't have to ask permission to correct it. The fish breeding one is odd, because it's the only catalytic organic recipe that cannot use quality modules. Yes, ore bacteria and pentapod egg production can use quality modules (though because they're catalytic, the biochamber cannot reuse any outputs that are higher quality). But for some reason fish breeding is not. Alfonse (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)