Talk:Materials and recipes: Difference between revisions
(→Organization of the items: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Are raw resources items ? == | == Are raw resources items ? == | ||
IMO they are too many things described/listed in this page. I think that it would be clearer if we limit the concept of '''Items''' to those who can be crafted IG (i.e. who can be | IMO they are too many things described/listed in this page. I think that it would be clearer if we limit the concept of '''Items''' to those who can be crafted IG (i.e. who can be fund in the crafting menu). | ||
As a consequence '''raw resources''' will have a dedicated page. BTW in the wiki a lot of links point directly to this subsection, doesn't that mean that it is a specific concept ? [[User:Mgiraud|Mgiraud]] ([[User talk:Mgiraud|talk]]) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | As a consequence '''raw resources''' will have a dedicated page. BTW in the wiki a lot of links point directly to this subsection, doesn't that mean that it is a specific concept ? [[User:Mgiraud|Mgiraud]] ([[User talk:Mgiraud|talk]]) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
As you can see, my proposition is to have a wiki organized like it is IG. [[User:Mgiraud|Mgiraud]] ([[User talk:Mgiraud|talk]]) 05:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | As you can see, my proposition is to have a wiki organized like it is IG. [[User:Mgiraud|Mgiraud]] ([[User talk:Mgiraud|talk]]) 05:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
: Makes sense to me. Most of the subsections currently here already have their own pages anyway, which would be a better place to list these particular groupings of items. --[[User:Super aardvark|Super aardvark]] ([[User talk:Super aardvark|talk]]) 02:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Remove spidertron remote etc? == | |||
- spidertron remote | |||
- red wire | |||
- green wire | |||
- discharge defense remote | |||
- artillery remote | |||
are no longer craftable items, and ingame - both factoriopedia and the crafting menu - doesnt show them in the same places anymore. Should we remove them from this page? Move them to an "unsorted" tab like ingame? --[[User:Zaz|Zaz]] ([[User talk:Zaz|talk]]) 14:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:54, 12 November 2024
Are raw resources items ?
IMO they are too many things described/listed in this page. I think that it would be clearer if we limit the concept of Items to those who can be crafted IG (i.e. who can be fund in the crafting menu).
As a consequence raw resources will have a dedicated page. BTW in the wiki a lot of links point directly to this subsection, doesn't that mean that it is a specific concept ? Mgiraud (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Organization of the items
I think that this page would be clearer (and with no more discussion/editing about sorting) if we use the same sections that those who are used IG in the crafting menu, in the same order : Logistics, Production, Intermediate products, Combat... In each section we may have a table for each line in the menu.
If we do that it would be easier to have a global introduction text, with a link to the crafting concept, as well as explanation in each section.
As you can see, my proposition is to have a wiki organized like it is IG. Mgiraud (talk) 05:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. Most of the subsections currently here already have their own pages anyway, which would be a better place to list these particular groupings of items. --Super aardvark (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Remove spidertron remote etc?
- spidertron remote - red wire - green wire - discharge defense remote - artillery remote are no longer craftable items, and ingame - both factoriopedia and the crafting menu - doesnt show them in the same places anymore. Should we remove them from this page? Move them to an "unsorted" tab like ingame? --Zaz (talk) 14:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)