User talk:Gangsir: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:What I was actually suggesting was creating {{T|To be completed}} through {{T|Translation}}, not creating a new template, but I might have needed to bee clearer. So our vision is that these kind of templates are gonna work just like templates like {{T|EquipNav}} or {{T|Infobox}} [[User:TheWombatGuru|TheWombatGuru]] ([[User talk:TheWombatGuru|talk]]) - <b>Factorio wiki administrator</b> 12:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC) | :What I was actually suggesting was creating {{T|To be completed}} through {{T|Translation}}, not creating a new template, but I might have needed to bee clearer. So our vision is that these kind of templates are gonna work just like templates like {{T|EquipNav}} or {{T|Infobox}} [[User:TheWombatGuru|TheWombatGuru]] ([[User talk:TheWombatGuru|talk]]) - <b>Factorio wiki administrator</b> 12:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
:: Plus, there's not really even a need to have "to be completed" templates, as pages that don't exist for a language are ''yet to be completed.'' There's no need to make a category for it. --[[User:Gangsir|Gangsir]] ([[User talk:Gangsir|talk]]) 20:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC) | :: Plus, there's not really even a need to have "to be completed" templates, as pages that don't exist for a language are ''yet to be completed.'' There's no need to make a category for it. --[[User:Gangsir|Gangsir]] ([[User talk:Gangsir|talk]]) 20:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
::: Sorry but if I had created this template it's because I think it covers a need. You are probably, as I am, a contributor in Wikipedia and know the concept of Quality scale. The method used in Wikipedia is IMO to complex for us as there are not so many contributors here. But need remains. I would like to be able to make a difference between a Stub (Very limited contents, e.g. Short description and Infobox), a Good start (The article can stay like that but has To be completed later, for example no time to translate everything or some things seem to be not relevant anymore), and a Good article (which can always been improved). For Stubs we have a template {{t|Stub}} and a Category: <nowiki>[[Category:Stubs]]</nowiki> with language oriented subcategories. I have a need to retrieve the "Good start" articles as well, in a dedicated category to better organize the job. | |||
::: E.g. if you compare two articles tagged as Stubs : [[Types/InventorySize]] and [[Inserter capacity bonus (research)]] the first one is clearly a stub but the second one is not. [[User:Mgiraud|Mgiraud]] ([[User talk:Mgiraud|talk]]) 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 3 September 2016
Hello, and welcome to my talk page. Feel free to click "Add topic" at the top to send me a message. I'll get back to you at the earliest opportunity.
Suppression of the template To be completed/fr
Hi,
Can you explain me why you had suppress the template {{To be completed/fr}}? The creation of this template was agreed with User:TheWombatGuru has you can see in my talk page. Mgiraud (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hello,
- What I was actually suggesting was creating {{To be completed}} through {{Translation}}, not creating a new template, but I might have needed to bee clearer. So our vision is that these kind of templates are gonna work just like templates like {{EquipNav}} or {{Infobox}} TheWombatGuru (talk) - Factorio wiki administrator 12:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Plus, there's not really even a need to have "to be completed" templates, as pages that don't exist for a language are yet to be completed. There's no need to make a category for it. --Gangsir (talk) 20:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry but if I had created this template it's because I think it covers a need. You are probably, as I am, a contributor in Wikipedia and know the concept of Quality scale. The method used in Wikipedia is IMO to complex for us as there are not so many contributors here. But need remains. I would like to be able to make a difference between a Stub (Very limited contents, e.g. Short description and Infobox), a Good start (The article can stay like that but has To be completed later, for example no time to translate everything or some things seem to be not relevant anymore), and a Good article (which can always been improved). For Stubs we have a template {{Stub}} and a Category: [[Category:Stubs]] with language oriented subcategories. I have a need to retrieve the "Good start" articles as well, in a dedicated category to better organize the job.
- E.g. if you compare two articles tagged as Stubs : Types/InventorySize and Inserter capacity bonus (research) the first one is clearly a stub but the second one is not. Mgiraud (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Plus, there's not really even a need to have "to be completed" templates, as pages that don't exist for a language are yet to be completed. There's no need to make a category for it. --Gangsir (talk) 20:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)