Talk:Long-handed inserter - Revision history

Bilka: Bilka moved page Talk:Long handed inserter to Talk:Long-handed inserter: Name changed in 1.1.3

2020-11-30T18:06:45Z

Bilka moved page Talk:Long handed inserter to Talk:Long-handed inserter: Name changed in 1.1.3

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 30 November 2020
(No difference)

Bilka: /* English Grammar */ Reply.

2019-10-07T20:34:28Z

English Grammar: Reply.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 7 October 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== English Grammar ==		== English Grammar ==
	A minor point, but I believe that the correct grammar for this item uses a hyphen and is "Long-handed inserter". [[User:GreenBeing\|GreenBeing]] ([[User talk:GreenBeing\|talk]]) 06:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)		A minor point, but I believe that the correct grammar for this item uses a hyphen and is "Long-handed inserter". [[User:GreenBeing\|GreenBeing]] ([[User talk:GreenBeing\|talk]]) 06:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
			:The wiki uses the same names as the game, so "long handed inserter" in this case. -- [[User:Bilka\|Bilka]] ([[User talk:Bilka\|talk]]) - <span style="color:#FF0000">Admin</span> 20:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

GreenBeing: /* English Grammar */

2019-10-07T06:14:03Z

English Grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 7 October 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:

	== English Grammar ==		== English Grammar ==
	A minor point, but I believe that the correct grammar for this item uses a hyphen and is "Long-handed inserter".		A minor point, but I believe that the correct grammar for this item uses a hyphen and is "Long-handed inserter". [[User:GreenBeing\|GreenBeing]] ([[User talk:GreenBeing\|talk]]) 06:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

GreenBeing: Suggested grammar change.

2019-10-07T06:13:14Z

Suggested grammar change.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:13, 7 October 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Currently it reads: Long handed ''inserters cannot grab moving items from blue belts.''. I believe it is incorrect, these CAN grab from blue belts.		Currently it reads: Long handed ''inserters cannot grab moving items from blue belts.''. I believe it is incorrect, these CAN grab from blue belts.
	* Agree, just tested in 0.17.38 and haven't seen described problems. [[User:Diraria\|Diraria]] ([[User talk:Diraria\|talk]]) 21:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)		* Agree, just tested in 0.17.38 and haven't seen described problems. [[User:Diraria\|Diraria]] ([[User talk:Diraria\|talk]]) 21:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

			== English Grammar ==
			A minor point, but I believe that the correct grammar for this item uses a hyphen and is "Long-handed inserter".

Diraria at 21:13, 12 May 2019

2019-05-12T21:13:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 12 May 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Currently it reads: Long handed ''inserters cannot grab moving items from blue belts.''. I believe it is incorrect, these CAN grab from blue belts.		Currently it reads: Long handed ''inserters cannot grab moving items from blue belts.''. I believe it is incorrect, these CAN grab from blue belts.
			* Agree, just tested in 0.17.38 and haven't seen described problems. [[User:Diraria\|Diraria]] ([[User talk:Diraria\|talk]]) 21:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Kostermw: /* Functionality incorrect? */ new section

2017-04-29T14:24:28Z

Functionality incorrect?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 29 April 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I made a change to the "range" of the long handed inserter and it's most common use case because I felt that the way the original writer counted the tiles was unintuitive. Originally it was written the [[long handed inserter]]s are commonly used to drop off items on belts '''two''' tiles from an assembler. I think it is when the belts are '''three''' tiles from an assembler. I realize this is the difference between counting the tiles in the space ''between'' them and counting the tiles ''inclusive'' of where the belt is.		I made a change to the "range" of the long handed inserter and it's most common use case because I felt that the way the original writer counted the tiles was unintuitive. Originally it was written the [[long handed inserter]]s are commonly used to drop off items on belts '''two''' tiles from an assembler. I think it is when the belts are '''three''' tiles from an assembler. I realize this is the difference between counting the tiles in the space ''between'' them and counting the tiles ''inclusive'' of where the belt is.
	My way of counting would put a belt "one tile away" as directly adjacent, where the other way would be "zero tiles away". I see both sides and was wondering how other people felt, because ultimately the idea is for this to be as understandable to as many people as possible. Maybe adding a screenshot would help? [[User:CapeD\|CapeD]] ([[User talk:CapeD\|talk]]) 20:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)		My way of counting would put a belt "one tile away" as directly adjacent, where the other way would be "zero tiles away". I see both sides and was wondering how other people felt, because ultimately the idea is for this to be as understandable to as many people as possible. Maybe adding a screenshot would help? [[User:CapeD\|CapeD]] ([[User talk:CapeD\|talk]]) 20:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

			== Functionality incorrect? ==

			Currently it reads: Long handed ''inserters cannot grab moving items from blue belts.''. I believe it is incorrect, these CAN grab from blue belts.

CapeD: Created page with "I made a change to the "range" of the long handed inserter and it's most common use case because I felt that the way the original writer counted the tiles was unintuitive. Ori..."

2017-03-21T20:12:48Z

Created page with "I made a change to the "range" of the long handed inserter and it's most common use case because I felt that the way the original writer counted the tiles was unintuitive. Ori..."

New page

I made a change to the "range" of the long handed inserter and it's most common use case because I felt that the way the original writer counted the tiles was unintuitive. Originally it was written the [[long handed inserter]]s are commonly used to drop off items on belts '''two''' tiles from an assembler. I think it is when the belts are '''three''' tiles from an assembler. I realize this is the difference between counting the tiles in the space ''between'' them and counting the tiles ''inclusive'' of where the belt is.
My way of counting would put a belt "one tile away" as directly adjacent, where the other way would be "zero tiles away". I see both sides and was wondering how other people felt, because ultimately the idea is for this to be as understandable to as many people as possible. Maybe adding a screenshot would help? [[User:CapeD|CapeD]] ([[User talk:CapeD|talk]]) 20:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)